See (below) the MN Gender program as evident in findings by Fixing Stillwater Schools

Discover the Agenda in Minnesota Schools to Change our Social Concept of Gender

See the facts of what they are doing, and if you still need to, consider the merits of their rationale.

See the MN Gender program by the findings of FSS in Stillwater

View the ISD 834 (Stillwater) Version of the MN Gender Program:

A Cross-Section Revealed by FSS (Fixing Stillwater Schools):

Teachers are now licensed (or have their license renewed) only by demonstrating loyalty to this dogma. Academic education is displaced by instruction promoting these beliefs to young children before they reach the age of reason. 

In Stillwater Area Schools this is routine. Normal. Expected … for everyone. Children and staff who believe that there are only two genders are “helped” by ever present reminders to conform their thinking to what is being promoted.  

Need proof? 

Using the Minnesota Data Practice Act (Minn. Stat. 13) Fixing Stillwater Schools obtained the documents below by asking for instructions given staff concerning youth who identify as a gender different for that identified at birth. Initially, the District indicated that there were up to 30,000 such documents from just 2 school years.  

Staff were reminded in a routine “Woke Wednesday” [#2452] communication to embrace and promote the “Genderbread Person” [#2453] and related values [#2454] to the children in their care. 

In a routine Health Class memo [#4238], professional LGBTQIA+ promotors, "Outfront MN [link]," are provided classroom access and time. In their outline [#4239] they both promote their world views using the “Gender Unicorn” and make it clear that students are expected to uphold these ideas in their school.

Staff also recommend book lists and off-site resources promoting LGBTQIA+ world view and beliefs to children in their care.  [#5334]  

To ensure that every teacher is prepared to present these beliefs to the children entrusted to them, Stillwater Area Schools substitutes LGBTQIA+ advocacy training for otherwise required academic training. In one document obtained [#4031] a science teacher questions if it is permissible to miss LGBTQIA+ advocacy training to take training related to the teaching of science. The need to clarify which is the higher priority is highly informative.  

Other LGBTQIA+ advocacy training for teachers is provided on the job by: 

GLSEN [doc and org link]       # 

Outfront MN [doc and org link]    #